Cognitive Reframing in Everyday Life: What My Hairdresser Taught Me
- Aurora Center for Psychology and Wellbeing
- Feb 26
- 3 min read
As a psychologist, I spend a lot of time explaining cognitive reframing, the practice of gently questioning the stories our minds create when something feels uncertain or disappointing.
Naturally, I expect these moments to happen in my office.
Instead, one of the best examples I’ve witnessed happened while I was sitting in a salon chair, quietly observing someone else’s spiral unfold under a dryer.
“He hasn’t texted,” the woman next to me said. “I knew it. I’m too intense. I probably overshared. I should not have talked that much about my cats… and my strong opinions about pasta. I always ruin things. Maybe it was the cats. No... it was the pasta. Oh gosh. I just ruin things.”
If you’ve ever replayed a conversation at midnight, you recognize the speed of that cascade.
Silence becomes evidence.Ambiguity becomes verdict. One evening becomes a character flaw.
There was a pause. The quiet hum of dryers filling the space.
My hairdresser, calmly working through a section of color, said:
“Or maybe you were just being yourself.”
The woman blinked.
The hairdresser continued, without missing a beat:
“And if someone is intimidated by pasta opinions, that’s useful information.”
It was gentle. Slightly amused. Entirely unbothered.
And it was a perfect reframe.
What Just Happened There?Understanding Cognitive Reframing in Everyday Life
The original interpretation:“I’m too much. I ruined this.”
The alternative:“Maybe I showed up honestly. Maybe this is about fit.”
Notice what the reframe didn’t do.
It simply shifted the meaning from defect to data.
That’s reframing at its best.
Why Our Minds Go There
Our brains dislike uncertainty.
When someone doesn’t text, the mind doesn’t tolerate “I don’t know.” It searches for a stable explanation. And strangely, self-blame feels stable.
“If it’s my fault, at least I understand it.”
Ambiguity is uncomfortable.
Blame is decisive.
So the mind constructs a story, quickly and confidently.
Reframing doesn’t deny disappointment. It simply widens the frame enough to include other possibilities.
Maybe this wasn’t a failure. Maybe it was information.
In some therapeutic models, including Internal Family Systems (IFS), we understand these spirals as protective parts trying to keep us safe from rejection or shame. If you’re curious how that works, you can read more about how IFS approaches moments of change here.
The Deeper Layer
We don’t spiral about pasta. We spiral about belonging.
About being acceptable in our unedited form.About whether enthusiasm makes us “too much.”About whether authenticity costs us connection.
That’s why the reframe matters. Not because it changes the outcome.
But because it softens the self-judgment.
Why This Matters in Therapy
It’s easier to reframe someone else’s story.
From the outside, perspective feels obvious. Inside the experience, especially when our nervous system is activated, the story feels airtight.
That’s where therapy can help.
Not by forcing optimism.
Not by dismissing pain.But by gently asking:
Is this the only interpretation?
What else could this mean?
What would change if this were about fit rather than flaw?
Sometimes the shift is subtle.
From:“I ruin things.” To:“Maybe I was just being myself.”
That small widening can change how the entire nervous system settles.
I left the salon that day thinking two things.
First, cognitive reframing is alive and well outside therapy offices.
Second, if pasta preferences are enough to scare someone away, that might be a screening tool, not a flaw.
Our minds are excellent storytellers.
We’re allowed to edit.
Related Posts
How different parts of you respond to uncertainty and how IFS helps create internal balance.
Why your nervous system reacts before your thoughts catch up.
A gentle reflection for when you’re unsure whether to start.
A compassionate perspective on change and self-pressure.
Comments